Last updated on December 16th, 2024
The EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CS3D) sets out rules for companies to address human rights and environmental impacts occurring in their operations and supply chains, and seeks to harmonize due diligence practices across the EU.
This Due Diligence directive outlines corporate liability for human rights abuses or environmental violations occurring across their chain of activities. Several Due Diligence acts already exist in the EU Member States, including French Duty of Vigilance law and German Supply Chain Due Diligence (LkSG or SCDDA). As a directive, it now requires all 27 EU Member States to transpose its provisions into their national laws, ensuring a unified framework for corporate sustainability and accountability throughout the union.
EU-based Companies:
Non-EU Companies and SMEs:
It also applies to Non-EU companies generating over €450 million in EU turnover or companies earning more than 22,5 million from royalties within the EU and having a turnover of more than €80 million in the EU.
While SMEs are not directly subject to the directive, they may be indirectly affected as suppliers or contractors for larger companies required to implement due diligence measures
The directive entered into force on July 26th, 2024. Member States shall transpose the directive into national laws by July 2026. The reporting obligations are rolling out in defined phases which depend on company size and turnover:
Reporting Year |
Fiscal Year Covered |
Company Criteria |
2027 |
2026 |
- EU Companies: >5,000 employees and annual worldwide turnover >€1.5 billion. |
2028 |
2027 |
- EU Companies: >3,000 employees and annual worldwide turnover >€900 million. |
2029 |
2028 |
- EU Companies: >1,000 employees and annual worldwide turnover >€450 million. |
The Directive sets a risk-based approach to due diligence that companies must follow by going through the following steps:
To assist in meeting these due diligence obligations, the Commission will provide general as well as sector-specific or risk-focused guidelines.
Companies must develop comprehensive due diligence policies with internal stakeholders, including:
Companies must create a transparent process for complaints regarding adverse impacts within the organization or its supply chain. This mechanism should:
Companies must identify actual and potential adverse impacts across three key levels:
This requires mapping operations at these levels to pinpoint where adverse impacts are most likely and severe. The mapping should consider relevant risk factors to create a comprehensive understanding of potential issues.
Once risks are identified, companies must conduct in-depth assessments of the most critical areas. This involves:
Prioritize risked based on:
Key Actions
Companies must take appropriate steps to prevent, remedy, or mitigate potential risks based on the findings.
Factors Influencing Actions depends on the company’s link to the risk, and if the risk is:
Caused solely by the company.
Jointly caused with subsidiaries or business partners.
Caused by business partners alone.
Minimize or neutralize the adverse impact based on severity and influence.
Implement prevention or corrective action plans
Adjust strategies, pricing, or purchasing policies.
Collaborate with entities to improve risk mitigation efforts.
Secure contractual commitments from partners to follow Code of Conduct.
Business Relationship Adjustments
Suspend or terminate relationships with entities contributing to the risk, unless doing so would worsen the situation.
Avoid establishing new relations that could perpetuate the issue.
If the company caused or jointly caused the harm, it must provide remediation.
the company may offer voluntary support for harm caused by partners.
Companies must:
Engage stakeholders effectively, providing relevant information and addressing requests.
Ensure security and anonymity.
Monitoring (Article 10)
Regularly assess the effectiveness through:
Policies for risk identification, evaluation, prioritization, and mitigation.
qualitative and quantitative indicators.
Stakeholder input.
Reporting (Article 11)
Publicly accessible.
Provided in a data-extractable format.
In terms of the transition plan for climate change mitigation, companies must adopt a plan compatible with:
the Paris Agreement and its limit of 1.5°C global warming.
Climate neutrality goals for 2050.
The transition plan shall include:
Time-bound targets for 2030 and every 5 years till 2050.
Decarbonization Strategies and funding allocation.
Administrative management and supervisory bodies for plan execution.
The consequences will vary across Member States as they transpose the directive into their national laws, consequences may be:
Financial Penalties: Substantial fines proportional to turnover, with severe impact on large multinationals.
Legal Liability: Risk of lawsuits for failing to address human rights or environmental violations, requiring compensation or corrective actions.
Reputational Damage: Publicized violations can harm brand image, erode consumer trust, and deter investors.
Operational Disruptions: Possible license suspension, restricted market access, or supply chain issues due to partner non-compliance.
Regulatory Scrutiny: Increased audits, reporting requirements, and compliance costs, potentially delaying operations.
To ensure compliance with the upcoming Directive, companies should start to design and implement an effective compliance system and get an understanding of their entire value chain in order to discover any human rights or environmental violations.
Check out the Due Diligence Framework which we have put together in the guide, Labor in Supply Chain Compliance.
Sounds complicated? Not with the right platform! TrusTrace provides actionable transparency of your entire supply chain and makes it easier to manage compliance, supply chain risk and communicate product origin easily and credibly. Contact us for more information on how we can help your company.
Disclaimer: At TrusTrace, we want to keep you informed on laws and regulations, but this information in the blog should not be considered or used as legal advice.